In a single word, how would one describe the mood of the Lotus user community? Depressed.
Following our recent column on Lotus conspiracy theories, we asked our readers if they believe there is a secret tech industry conspiracy to keep Lotus Notes and Domino down.
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
However, the majority of respondents told us that there's really no conspiracy. Users believe the decline of Notes and Domino is directly tied to slick marketing on the part of Microsoft, and IBM's inability to respond in two key areas: effective marketing and its user interface. A flashier, trendier UI, users said, would help improve decision makers' opinion of Notes.
Even though the Notes and Domino community still believes its platform is far superior to Microsoft's, users are upset that IBM is seemingly content with its "also-ran" status, making them feel like second-class citizens.
Here are excerpts of selected responses:
"I believe Microsoft folks are very, very good at marketing and positioning their products. They are steadily grabbing market share from IBM Lotus," he said. "As a CLP, it has made me change my field. I am learning .NET and Java because I believe if the trend goes on, the Notes market will be reduced to below 10% in few years."
Sabir added that if Microsoft had a product like Notes and Domino, "it would have a 90% market share," because it is better than IBM at running its collaboration business, he said. "I have yet to see any company that is able to compete with them and take away market share, but I have consistently seen it the other way around -- with Lotus 123, Word Perfect, Quicken, Netscape, Nintendo and AIM.
"I feel embarrassed when a user asks me why can't they sort the Sent folder by file size -- they want to delete sent e-mails with large attachments -- or why can't they launch an attachment by double clicking on it," he added. "Domino is a very powerful, robust platform, but the Notes client is not as intuitive and slick as the Outlook client is."
"I've watched Microsoft's tactics for years, so the negatives or insinuations that show up in the trade mags or larger media outlets never surprise me," he said, adding that despite its best efforts, it remains unable to kill Notes.
"We need XML and .NET, since they say that Lotus stuff is legacy software," he said, with tongue-in-cheek.
He added that somewhere along the way, IBM stopped advocating the unique value that Lotus' software offers. "Somehow, some marketing genius got it confused with a pizza -- and since, it has never recovered."
"For example, the Notes group recently did a complete redesign of one of our Web sites. The time of delivery of design to live was just two weeks with one person working part time," he said. "Our corporate Web site took three people six months to redesign. The only difference? The first site was developed in Domino, and the corporate site uses Microsoft products."
He also said uptime for Notes and Domino is close to 99.9% at his company, while its Exchange server usually is down for at least two hours each week during the work day. Still, many just don't like Notes.
"When we've questioned some of our clients' decision to migrate to Microsoft, one of them gave us no other reason than, 'It's cool,'" he said. "On many occasions I have come across users who enjoy criticizing Lotus Notes, and yet have never learned how to look for information using a full text search, let alone take advantage of other basic Notes features."
Jon also said that in other cases, new executives choose Microsoft over Lotus because they are more familiar with the products from Redmond, meaning that "the supplier who makes the grooviest adverts and the catchiest slogans will win the day. And at the moment, that means Microsoft."
"To develop our solution with Microsoft tools would have required the integration of several different tools rather then one integrated environment," he said. "The result was a robust application that was developed in much less time."