For a WebSphere Portal 5.1 installation, are there any caveats to using RAD 6 and WAS 6 versus WSAD 5 and WAS 5?
For a WebSphere Portal 5.1 installation you can use either WSAD 5 or RAD 6 to develop portlets. Of course RAD 6 has all the latest and greatest bells and whistles for portlet development, which allows you to maximize the capabilities in WebSphere Portal 5.1. I know that WSAD supports development of portlets that use the IBM API and the JSR-168 API (IBM's strategic direction). However, I believe that RAD 6 has superior support for development of Struts and JSF portlets, both of which are supported in WebSphere Portal 5.1. While JSF is relatively new (and, therefore, in my humble opinion,s needs to be proven), Struts portlets are an invaluable tool for creating wizard-like portlets.
Dig Deeper on IBM WebSphere
What approach would be the best to programmatically integrate a custom Domino DB with a JSR 168 portlet? I'm thinking about performance.
Can I install WPS 5.1 on an existing WAS 6 Notes/Domino system? I have a server that already has WAS6 Notes/Domino running. I also want to install ...
What is the recommended logical drive configuration for a WebSphere Portal installation on a Windows machine (i.e., C: OS, D: WPS and WAS)? Also, ...
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.